April 30, 2007

“The stakes are high”?

The Telegraph says the “stakes are high” when our men kill the enemy, because killing the civilians who are sometimes among the enemy can be an effective recruiting tool:
As the boat reached the shore, Captain Larry Staley tilted the nose of the lead Apache gunship downwards into a dive. One of the men turned to face the helicopter and sank to his knees. Capt Staley’s gunner pressed the trigger and the man disappeared in a cloud of smoke and dust.
By the time the gunships had finished, 21 minutes later, military officials say 14 Taliban were confirmed dead, including one of their key commanders in Helmand…American intelligence named the dead commander as Mullah Najibullah, who, they said, had been responsible for leading attacks against British forces in and around the town of Sangin, in Helmand.
The attack, and four other missions against suspected Taliban compounds, are clearly effective, but the stakes are high. Coalition attacks on mistakenly identified targets here, as in Iraq, have left dozens of civilians dead and wounded and can act as a recruiting sergeant for the terrorists.
But Capt Staley said he had no qualms about pressing home such attacks until no one was left standing and claimed that American pilots were more effective than their British Apache counterparts, who he said flew higher and were less ruthless in finishing off their targets. “The Brits are good but they don’t have the extreme aggression that we do.”

The Telegraph’s comment that the “stakes are high” because of the enemy’s recruitment efforts means, among other things, that we have not even reached the end of the beginning of this war.

Read more at admin

Popularity: 1% [?]

No tag for this post.
No responses to "“The stakes are high”?"

No comments yet.

Leave a comment
Name : 
Mail : 
Website : 
Message :